lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 16 Feb 2022 11:22:52 +0100
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
Cc:     arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Ricky WU <ricky_wu@...ltek.com>,
        Thomas Hebb <tommyhebb@...il.com>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] mmc: rtsx: Use pm_runtime_{get,put}() to handle
 runtime PM

On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 05:21, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 8:28 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 06:50, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Commit 5b4258f6721f ("misc: rtsx: rts5249 support runtime PM") doesn't
> > > use pm_runtime_{get,put}() helpers when it should, so the RPM refcount
> > > keeps at zero, hence its parent driver, rtsx_pci, has to do lots of
> > > weird tricks to keep it from runtime suspending.
> > >
> > > So use those helpers at right places to properly manage runtime PM.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 5b4258f6721f ("misc: rtsx: rts5249 support runtime PM")
> > > Cc: Ricky WU <ricky_wu@...ltek.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
> >
> > The runtime PM reference counting for the mmc host device is managed
> > by the mmc core. Have a look at __mmc_claim_host() and
> > mmc_release_host().
> >
> > In other words, the runtime PM reference counting should not be needed
> > in the mmc host driver, unless there are some specific cases, like for
> > example during ->probe|remove().
> >
> > So perhaps it's only the changes in the ->probe|remove() functions
> > that you need to fix the problems? No?
>
> Yes you are right. Let me send a patch to remove redundant PM helpers
> from this patch.

Ohh, I didn't know that Greg already queued this up. Seems like I
don't get more than one week to review. :-)

Alright, I will look at your new patch then.

Kind regards
Uffe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ