[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y22bm25y.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 23:22:33 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] Fix LKDTM for PPC64/IA64/PARISC v4
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 01:40:55PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> PPC64/IA64/PARISC have function descriptors. LKDTM doesn't work
>> on those three architectures because LKDTM messes up function
>> descriptors with functions.
>>
>> This series does some cleanup in the three architectures and
>> refactors function descriptors so that it can then easily use it
>> in a generic way in LKDTM.
>
> Thanks for doing this! It looks good to me. :)
How should we merge this series, it's a bit all over the map.
I could put it in a topic branch?
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists