[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220216141009.ymmjduf5doqnhnqy@black.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 17:10:09 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, aarcange@...hat.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, david@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, jgross@...e.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
joro@...tes.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com, knsathya@...nel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, sdeep@...are.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 16/29] x86/boot: Add a trampoline for booting APs via
firmware handoff
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 11:07:15AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:36:24AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > How can signle trampoline_start cover all cases?
>
> All I'm saying is that the real mode header should have a single
>
> u32 trampoline_start;
>
> instead of:
>
> u32 trampoline_start;
> u32 sev_es_trampoline_start;
> u32 trampoline_start64;
>
> which all are the same thing on a single system.
But these are generated at build time, no?
As far as I can see it is initialized in arch/x86/realmode/rm/header.S by
linker.
I'm confused.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists