[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4i_mGFO4z3sVYShhhvBO_WASee-EfZK0U+qWw5usDWzxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 17:47:19 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, david <david@...morbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 7/9] mm: Introduce mf_dax_kill_procs() for fsdax case
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 4:41 AM Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com> wrote:
>
> This function is called at the end of RMAP routine, i.e. filesystem
> recovery function, to collect and kill processes using a shared page of
> DAX file. The difference with mf_generic_kill_procs() is, it accepts
> file's (mapping,offset) instead of struct page because different files'
> mappings and offsets may share the same page in fsdax mode.
> It will be called when filesystem's RMAP results are found.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 4 ++
> mm/memory-failure.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 9b1d56c5c224..0420189e4788 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -3195,6 +3195,10 @@ enum mf_flags {
> MF_SOFT_OFFLINE = 1 << 3,
> MF_UNPOISON = 1 << 4,
> };
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FS_DAX)
> +int mf_dax_kill_procs(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index,
> + unsigned long count, int mf_flags);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_FS_DAX */
> extern int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags);
> extern void memory_failure_queue(unsigned long pfn, int flags);
> extern void memory_failure_queue_kick(int cpu);
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index b2d13eba1071..8d123cc4102e 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -304,10 +304,9 @@ void shake_page(struct page *p)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(shake_page);
>
> -static unsigned long dev_pagemap_mapping_shift(struct page *page,
> - struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +static unsigned long dev_pagemap_mapping_shift(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + unsigned long address)
> {
> - unsigned long address = vma_address(page, vma);
> unsigned long ret = 0;
> pgd_t *pgd;
> p4d_t *p4d;
> @@ -347,9 +346,8 @@ static unsigned long dev_pagemap_mapping_shift(struct page *page,
> * Schedule a process for later kill.
> * Uses GFP_ATOMIC allocations to avoid potential recursions in the VM.
> */
> -static void add_to_kill(struct task_struct *tsk, struct page *p,
> - struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> - struct list_head *to_kill)
> +static void add_to_kill(struct task_struct *tsk, struct page *p, pgoff_t pgoff,
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct list_head *to_kill)
> {
> struct to_kill *tk;
>
> @@ -360,9 +358,15 @@ static void add_to_kill(struct task_struct *tsk, struct page *p,
> }
>
> tk->addr = page_address_in_vma(p, vma);
> - if (is_zone_device_page(p))
> - tk->size_shift = dev_pagemap_mapping_shift(p, vma);
> - else
> + if (is_zone_device_page(p)) {
> + /*
> + * Since page->mapping is not used for fsdax, we need
> + * calculate the address based on the vma.
> + */
> + if (p->pgmap->type == MEMORY_DEVICE_FS_DAX)
> + tk->addr = vma_pgoff_address(vma, pgoff);
> + tk->size_shift = dev_pagemap_mapping_shift(vma, tk->addr);
> + } else
> tk->size_shift = page_shift(compound_head(p));
>
> /*
> @@ -510,7 +514,7 @@ static void collect_procs_anon(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
> if (!page_mapped_in_vma(page, vma))
> continue;
> if (vma->vm_mm == t->mm)
> - add_to_kill(t, page, vma, to_kill);
> + add_to_kill(t, page, 0, vma, to_kill);
Why is the @pgoff argument 0? @pgoff is available. Not that I expect
dax pages will ever be anonymous, might as well not leave that land
mine for future refactoring.
Other than that you can add:
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists