[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15b95695-6fbc-1916-ff39-abf13e989fc4@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:36:51 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Marcello Sylvester Bauer <sylv@...v.io>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] hwmon: (pmbus) Add regulator supply into macro
On 2/17/22 02:23, Marcello Sylvester Bauer wrote:
> Add optional regulator supply into PWBUS_REGULATOR macro. This makes it
The code doesn't look optional to me. What exactly is optional ?
> possible to define a vin-supply in DT. Not defining a supply will only
> cause the following debug output:
>
> ```
> Looking up vin-supply property in node [...] failed
> ```
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcello Sylvester Bauer <sylv@...v.io>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h
> index e0aa8aa46d8c..38f049d68d32 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h
> @@ -464,6 +464,7 @@ extern const struct regulator_ops pmbus_regulator_ops;
> #define PMBUS_REGULATOR(_name, _id) \
> [_id] = { \
> .name = (_name # _id), \
> + .supply_name = "vin", \
> .id = (_id), \
> .of_match = of_match_ptr(_name # _id), \
> .regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"), \
That seems to be quite far reaching. How does this affect / change behavior
of existing systems which so far did not expect supply_name to be set ?
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists