[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yg6Ku8XqnTjvNCrC@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:49:47 -0800
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>
Cc: "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
"javier@...igon.com" <javier@...igon.com>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"dm-devel@...hat.com" <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
"linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"msnitzer@...hat.com" <msnitzer@...hat.com>,
"bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"hare@...e.de" <hare@...e.de>,
"kbusch@...nel.org" <kbusch@...nel.org>,
"Frederick.Knight@...app.com" <Frederick.Knight@...app.com>,
"osandov@...com" <osandov@...com>,
"lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"djwong@...nel.org" <djwong@...nel.org>,
"josef@...icpanda.com" <josef@...icpanda.com>,
"clm@...com" <clm@...com>, "dsterba@...e.com" <dsterba@...e.com>,
"tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>, "jack@...e.com" <jack@...e.com>,
"joshi.k@...sung.com" <joshi.k@...sung.com>,
"arnav.dawn@...sung.com" <arnav.dawn@...sung.com>,
"nitheshshetty@...il.com" <nitheshshetty@...il.com>,
SelvaKumar S <selvakuma.s1@...sung.com>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] block: Introduce queue limits for copy-offload
support
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:16:21AM +0000, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> On 2/17/22 1:07 AM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> >> index efed3820cbf7..792e6d556589 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> >> @@ -254,6 +254,13 @@ struct queue_limits {
> >> unsigned int discard_alignment;
> >> unsigned int zone_write_granularity;
> >>
> >> + unsigned long max_hw_copy_sectors;
> >> + unsigned long max_copy_sectors;
> >> + unsigned int max_hw_copy_range_sectors;
> >> + unsigned int max_copy_range_sectors;
> >> + unsigned short max_hw_copy_nr_ranges;
> >> + unsigned short max_copy_nr_ranges;
> >
> > Before limits start growing more.. I wonder if we should just
> > stuff hw offload stuff to its own struct within queue_limits.
> >
> > Christoph?
> >
>
> Potentially use a pointer to structure and maybe make it configurable,
Did you mean to make queue limits local or for hw offload and make that
a pointer? If so that seems odd because even for hw copy offload we
still need the other limits no?
So what I meant was that struct queue_limits seems to be getting large,
and that hw copy offload seems like an example use case where we should
probably use a separate struct for it. And while at it, well, start
adding kdocs for these things, because, there's tons of things which
could use kdoc love.
> although I'm not sure about the later part, I'll let Christoph decide
> that.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists