[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220217184829.1991035-8-jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 19:48:23 +0100
From: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arnd Bergman <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Brian Johannesmeyer <bjohannesmeyer@...il.com>,
Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@...nl>,
"Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@...nl>, Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 07/13] udp_tunnel: remove the usage of the list iterator after the loop
The usage of node->dev after the loop body is a legitimate type
confusion if the break was not hit. It will compare an undefined
memory location with dev that could potentially be equal. The value
of node->dev in this case could either be a random struct member of the
head element or an out-of-bounds value.
Therefore it is more safe to use the found variable. With the
introduction of speculative safe list iterator this check could be
replaced with if (!node).
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
---
net/ipv4/udp_tunnel_nic.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp_tunnel_nic.c b/net/ipv4/udp_tunnel_nic.c
index b91003538d87..c47f9fb36d29 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp_tunnel_nic.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp_tunnel_nic.c
@@ -842,11 +842,14 @@ udp_tunnel_nic_unregister(struct net_device *dev, struct udp_tunnel_nic *utn)
*/
if (info->shared) {
struct udp_tunnel_nic_shared_node *node, *first;
+ bool found = false;
list_for_each_entry(node, &info->shared->devices, list)
- if (node->dev == dev)
+ if (node->dev == dev) {
+ found = true;
break;
- if (node->dev != dev)
+ }
+ if (!found)
return;
list_del(&node->list);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists