lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 17 Feb 2022 11:53:41 +0800
From:   Wang Jianchao <jianchao.wan9@...il.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V4 0/6] blk: make blk-rq-qos policies pluggable and modular



On 2022/2/17 11:21 上午, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/16/22 8:13 PM, Wang Jianchao (Kuaishou) wrote:
>> Hi Jens
>>
>> blk-rq-qos is a standalone framework out of io-sched and can be used to
>> control or observe the IO progress in block-layer with hooks. blk-rq-qos
>> is a great design but right now, it is totally fixed and built-in and shut
>> out peoples who want to use it with external module.
>>
>> This patchset attempts to make blk-rq-qos framework pluggable and modular.
>> Then we can update the blk-rq-qos policy module w/o stopping the IO workload.
>> And it is more convenient to introduce new policy on old machines w/o udgrade
>> kernel. And we can close all of the blk-rq-qos policy if we needn't any of
>> them. At the moment, the request_queue.rqos list is empty, we needn't to
>> waste cpu cyles on them.
> 
> I like this patchset, would be a lot more convenient and helps
> efficiency.
> 
> What kind of testing have you done on it?
> 
I have run blktests against this patchset in a VM machine along with a new test
case for switching rqos policies while running IO. 

https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=164506848620632&w=2

And also there is a bit different version running on v4.18 with more tests

Thanks
Jianchao

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ