linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MIPS: remove asm/war.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 17 Feb 2022 21:47:16 +0100
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To:     "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
Cc:     linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: remove asm/war.h

On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 01:58:01PM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/r4k-bugs64.c b/arch/mips/kernel/r4k-bugs64.c
> > index 35729c9e6cfa..11392e40d034 100644
> > --- a/arch/mips/kernel/r4k-bugs64.c
> > +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/r4k-bugs64.c
> > @@ -163,7 +163,8 @@ static __always_inline __init void check_mult_sh(void)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	pr_cont("no.\n");
> > -	panic(bug64hit, !R4000_WAR ? r4kwar : nowar);
> > +	panic(bug64hit, !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_R4000_WORKAROUNDS) ? r4kwar :
> > +								    nowar);
> 
>  I think it'll read better if formatted like this:
> 
> 	panic(bug64hit,
> 	      !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_R4000_WORKAROUNDS) ? r4kwar : nowar);
> 
> or without the negation even:
> 
> 	panic(bug64hit,
> 	      IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_R4000_WORKAROUNDS) ? nowar : r4kwar);
> 
> Likewise throughout.

that looks much nicer, I'll send a v2 with that changed

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]