[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <70f47a79438d6962fb5b633e1f2756763bcc6507.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:24:18 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: serge@...lyn.com, christian.brauner@...ntu.com,
containers@...ts.linux.dev, dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, krzysztof.struczynski@...wei.com,
roberto.sassu@...wei.com, mpeters@...hat.com, lhinds@...hat.com,
lsturman@...hat.com, puiterwi@...hat.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
jamjoom@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paul@...l-moore.com, rgb@...hat.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 11/27] ima: Move ima_lsm_policy_notifier into
ima_namespace
On Thu, 2022-02-17 at 15:59 -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >
> >> Move the ima_lsm_policy_notifier into the ima_namespace. Each IMA
> >> namespace can now register its own LSM policy change notifier callback.
> >> The policy change notifier for the init_ima_ns still remains in init_ima()
> >> and therefore handle the registration of the callback for all other
> >> namespaces in init_ima_namespace().
> >>
> >> Suppress the kernel warning 'rule for LSM <label> is undefined` for all
> >> other IMA namespaces than the init_ima_ns.
> > Instead of ignoring the warnings totally, perhaps use either the
> > "ratelimited" or "once" function options for non init_ima_ns. It would
> > be nice if these functions could be namespace aware, so that each
> > affected IMA namespace would contain at least one warning.
>
> The problem is that any user can now repeatedly create user namespaces
> and with that IMA namespaces and cause the kernel log to fill up with
> these messages and also flood the audit log -- I guess one could
> describe it as an unwanted side-effect. I am afraid that for as long as
> the kernel log is not namespaced it's probably best to just turn them
> off for non-init_ima_ns.
There are functions - pr_warn_once() or pr_warn_ratelimited() - that
limit the number of kernel messages. In addition to the number of
potential kernel messages, there's also the issue of being able to
differentiate between init_ima_ns and other IMA namespaces. I think
that is more of a concern than rate limiting.
--
thanks,
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists