[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220217053028.96432-3-leobras@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 02:30:30 -0300
From: Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
David Gilbert <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc: Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] x86/kvm/fpu: Remove kvm_vcpu_arch.guest_supported_xcr0
kvm_vcpu_arch currently contains the guest supported features in both
guest_supported_xcr0 and guest_fpu.fpstate->user_xfeatures field.
Currently both fields are set to the same value in
kvm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid() and are not changed anywhere else after that.
Since it's not good to keep duplicated data, remove guest_supported_xcr0.
To keep the code more readable, introduce kvm_guest_supported_xcr()
and kvm_guest_supported_xfd() to replace the previous usages of
guest_supported_xcr0.
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 -
arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 5 +++--
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 6dcccb304775..ec9830d2aabf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -703,7 +703,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
struct fpu_guest guest_fpu;
u64 xcr0;
- u64 guest_supported_xcr0;
struct kvm_pio_request pio;
void *pio_data;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
index 71125291c578..b8f8d268d058 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
@@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *best;
+ u64 guest_supported_xcr0;
best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 1, 0);
if (best && apic) {
@@ -293,10 +294,10 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
kvm_apic_set_version(vcpu);
}
- vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xcr0 =
+ guest_supported_xcr0 =
cpuid_get_supported_xcr0(vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries, vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent);
- vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.fpstate->user_xfeatures = vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xcr0;
+ vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.fpstate->user_xfeatures = guest_supported_xcr0;
kvm_update_pv_runtime(vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 641044db415d..92177e2ff664 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -984,6 +984,18 @@ void kvm_load_host_xsave_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_load_host_xsave_state);
+static inline u64 kvm_guest_supported_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ u64 guest_supported_xcr0 = vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.fpstate->user_xfeatures;
+
+ return guest_supported_xcr0;
+}
+
+static inline u64 kvm_guest_supported_xfd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return kvm_guest_supported_xcr(vcpu) & XFEATURE_MASK_USER_DYNAMIC;
+}
+
static int __kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 xcr)
{
u64 xcr0 = xcr;
@@ -1003,7 +1015,7 @@ static int __kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 xcr)
* saving. However, xcr0 bit 0 is always set, even if the
* emulated CPU does not support XSAVE (see kvm_vcpu_reset()).
*/
- valid_bits = vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xcr0 | XFEATURE_MASK_FP;
+ valid_bits = kvm_guest_supported_xcr(vcpu) | XFEATURE_MASK_FP;
if (xcr0 & ~valid_bits)
return 1;
@@ -3706,8 +3718,7 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XFD))
return 1;
- if (data & ~(XFEATURE_MASK_USER_DYNAMIC &
- vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xcr0))
+ if (data & ~(kvm_guest_supported_xfd(vcpu)))
return 1;
fpu_update_guest_xfd(&vcpu->arch.guest_fpu, data);
@@ -3717,8 +3728,7 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XFD))
return 1;
- if (data & ~(XFEATURE_MASK_USER_DYNAMIC &
- vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xcr0))
+ if (data & ~(kvm_guest_supported_xfd(vcpu)))
return 1;
vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.xfd_err = data;
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists