lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:42:00 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
From:   "Jing Leng" <3090101217@....edu.cn>
To:     "Greg KH" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     balbi@...nel.org, ruslan.bilovol@...il.com,
        pavel.hofman@...tera.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Jing Leng" <jleng@...arella.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: f_uac1: add set requests support

Hi Greg KH,

> So is this a bug in the Host side to not do stuff like this?  Why not
> fix it there instead?
> 
> Where is the requirement that this command must be handled by the
> device?
> 

First we need to clarify two issues.

1. Does the Ubuntu go beyond the UAC1 specification?
No. 
On page 66 of the UAC1 specification (
https://www.usb.org/sites/default/files/audio10.pdf):
The bRequest can be SET_CUR, SET_MIN, SET_MAX, SET_RES or SET_MEM.
In most cases, only the CUR and MEM attribute will be supported for
the Set request. However, this specification does not prevent a
designer from making other attributes programmable.
Supplement: Windows 10 only sends SET_CUR request.

2. Does the old version kernel have the problem on the Ubuntu?
NO. (e.g. linux-5.10)
The problem is introduced by the following modification:
    commit 0356e6283c7177391d144612f4b12986ed5c4f6e
    Author: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@...il.com>
    Date:   Mon Jul 12 14:55:29 2021 +0200

        usb: gadget: f_uac1: add volume and mute support

Since Ubuntu doesn't go beyond the UAC1 specification and the problem
is introduced by new version kernel, Why don't we perfect it on 
kernel side?

Thanks
Jing Leng

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ