[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220217102406.3697941-9-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 11:24:06 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 8/8] kernel/fork: Use IS_ENABLED() in account_kernel_stack().
Not strickly needed but checking CONFIG_VMAP_STACK instead of
task_stack_vm_area()' result allows the compiler the remove the else
path in the CONFIG_VMAP_STACK case where the pointer can't be NULL.
Check for CONFIG_VMAP_STACK in order to use the proper path.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/fork.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index aa17ed2a2afc7..4c97e0b5fb62a 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -485,16 +485,16 @@ void vm_area_free(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
static void account_kernel_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, int account)
{
- void *stack = task_stack_page(tsk);
- struct vm_struct *vm = task_stack_vm_area(tsk);
-
- if (vm) {
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VMAP_STACK)) {
+ struct vm_struct *vm = task_stack_vm_area(tsk);
int i;
for (i = 0; i < THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE; i++)
mod_lruvec_page_state(vm->pages[i], NR_KERNEL_STACK_KB,
account * (PAGE_SIZE / 1024));
} else {
+ void *stack = task_stack_page(tsk);
+
/* All stack pages are in the same node. */
mod_lruvec_kmem_state(stack, NR_KERNEL_STACK_KB,
account * (THREAD_SIZE / 1024));
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists