linux-kernel - Re: [Freedreno] [REPOST PATCH v4 13/13] drm/msm/dsi: Add support for DSC configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yg4otzVk3HlA8rlE@matsya>
Date:   Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:21:35 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
Cc:     Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@...eaurora.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [REPOST PATCH v4 13/13] drm/msm/dsi: Add support for
 DSC configuration

Hi Marijn,

On 17-02-22, 10:27, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> Vinod,
> 
> On 2022-02-10 16:04:23, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > When DSC is enabled, we need to configure DSI registers accordingly and
> > configure the respective stream compression registers.
> > 
> > Add support to calculate the register setting based on DSC params and
> > timing information and configure these registers.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> 
> I supplied a rather extensive - yet merely scratching the surface -
> review of this patch in:
> 
>     https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20211211000315.pavmcc7cc73ilb6l@SoMainline.org/

Sorry somehow I seem to have overlooked this one.
> 
> It seems none of those points have been addressed, bar creating a mesa
> MR to update dsi.xml with a subpar description of the registers (offsets
> only).

Mesa MR was planned as we get more closer to having reviews.

> For every point that is intentionally ignored, please at least supply a
> justification of why you think this is the right thing to do.

Ofcourse, i will reply to these now and address as required.

-- 
~Vinod