[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220217111004.GA73979@5a5c9590ad42>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 19:10:04 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Guixin Liu <kanie@...ux.alibaba.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
bostroesser@...il.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
target-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xiaoguang.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, xlpang@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH] scsi:target:tcmu:
tcmu_ioctl_copy_between_sgl_and_iovec() can be static
drivers/target/target_core_user.c:1987:6: warning: symbol 'tcmu_ioctl_copy_between_sgl_and_iovec' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/target/target_core_user.c:2031:6: warning: symbol 'tcmu_ioctl' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
---
drivers/target/target_core_user.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_user.c b/drivers/target/target_core_user.c
index afea088f24862b..ea1af59e03deff 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_user.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_user.c
@@ -1984,7 +1984,7 @@ static int tcmu_release(struct uio_info *info, struct inode *inode)
return 0;
}
-long tcmu_ioctl_copy_between_sgl_and_iovec(struct tcmu_cmd *tcmu_cmd,
+static long tcmu_ioctl_copy_between_sgl_and_iovec(struct tcmu_cmd *tcmu_cmd,
struct iovec __user *uiovec,
unsigned long vcnt,
bool is_copy_to_sgl)
@@ -2028,7 +2028,7 @@ long tcmu_ioctl_copy_between_sgl_and_iovec(struct tcmu_cmd *tcmu_cmd,
return copy_ret;
}
-long tcmu_ioctl(struct uio_info *info, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
+static long tcmu_ioctl(struct uio_info *info, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
{
struct tcmu_dev *udev = container_of(info, struct tcmu_dev, uio_info);
struct tcmu_data_xfer __user *uxfer = (struct tcmu_data_xfer __user *)arg;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists