[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220217131036.GC32679@chaop.bj.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 21:10:36 +0800
From: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
qemu-devel@...gnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
luto@...nel.org, jun.nakajima@...el.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, david@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/12] mm/shmem: Support memfile_notifier
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 08:29:56PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 09:21:13PM +0800, Chao Peng wrote:
> > It maintains a memfile_notifier list in shmem_inode_info structure and
> > implements memfile_pfn_ops callbacks defined by memfile_notifier. It
> > then exposes them to memfile_notifier via
> > shmem_get_memfile_notifier_info.
> >
> > We use SGP_NOALLOC in shmem_get_lock_pfn since the pages should be
> > allocated by userspace for private memory. If there is no pages
> > allocated at the offset then error should be returned so KVM knows that
> > the memory is not private memory.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/shmem_fs.h | 4 ++
> > mm/memfile_notifier.c | 12 +++++-
> > mm/shmem.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/shmem_fs.h b/include/linux/shmem_fs.h
> > index 166158b6e917..461633587eaf 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/shmem_fs.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/shmem_fs.h
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> > #include <linux/percpu_counter.h>
> > #include <linux/xattr.h>
> > #include <linux/fs_parser.h>
> > +#include <linux/memfile_notifier.h>
> >
> > /* inode in-kernel data */
> >
> > @@ -24,6 +25,9 @@ struct shmem_inode_info {
> > struct shared_policy policy; /* NUMA memory alloc policy */
> > struct simple_xattrs xattrs; /* list of xattrs */
> > atomic_t stop_eviction; /* hold when working on inode */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMFILE_NOTIFIER
> > + struct memfile_notifier_list memfile_notifiers;
> > +#endif
> > struct inode vfs_inode;
> > };
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/memfile_notifier.c b/mm/memfile_notifier.c
> > index 8171d4601a04..b4699cbf629e 100644
> > --- a/mm/memfile_notifier.c
> > +++ b/mm/memfile_notifier.c
> > @@ -41,11 +41,21 @@ void memfile_notifier_fallocate(struct memfile_notifier_list *list,
> > srcu_read_unlock(&srcu, id);
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SHMEM
> > +extern int shmem_get_memfile_notifier_info(struct inode *inode,
> > + struct memfile_notifier_list **list,
> > + struct memfile_pfn_ops **ops);
> > +#endif
> > +
> > static int memfile_get_notifier_info(struct inode *inode,
> > struct memfile_notifier_list **list,
> > struct memfile_pfn_ops **ops)
> > {
> > - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SHMEM
> > + ret = shmem_get_memfile_notifier_info(inode, list, ops);
> > +#endif
>
> This looks backwards. Can we have some register method for memory backing
> store and call it from shmem.c?
Agreed. That would be clearer.
Chao
>
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > int memfile_register_notifier(struct inode *inode,
>
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists