[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yg5UW4WzL2NX4st5@shredder>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 15:57:47 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch,
vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, rajur@...lsio.com,
claudiu.manoil@....com, sgoutham@...vell.com, gakula@...vell.com,
sbhatta@...vell.com, hkelam@...vell.com, saeedm@...dia.com,
leon@...nel.org, idosch@...dia.com, petrm@...dia.com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
simon.horman@...igine.com, jhs@...atatu.com,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
baowen.zheng@...igine.com, louis.peens@...ronome.com,
peng.zhang@...igine.com, oss-drivers@...igine.com, roid@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] flow_offload: reject offload for all
drivers with invalid police parameters
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 02:49:35PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Tested-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Thanks for testing
>
> But could we cut down on line length a little? Example for sja1105
> (messages were also shortened):
No problem
[...]
> Also, if you create a "validate" function for every driver, you'll
> remove code duplication for those drivers that support both matchall and
> flower policers.
Will do
Powered by blists - more mailing lists