[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220217135645.1427466-6-eugen.hristev@microchip.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 15:56:37 +0200
From: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>
To: <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <jacopo@...ndi.org>,
<hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>, <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
CC: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
"Eugen Hristev" <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 05/13] media: atmel: atmel-sama5d2-isc: fix wrong mask in YUYV format check
While this does not happen in production, this check should be done
versus the mask, as checking with the YCYC value may not include
some bits that may be set.
Is it correct and safe to check the whole mask.
Fixes: 123aaf816b95 ("media: atmel: atmel-sama5d2-isc: fix YUYV format")
Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>
---
drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-sama5d2-isc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-sama5d2-isc.c b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-sama5d2-isc.c
index c244682ea22f..025c3e8a7e95 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-sama5d2-isc.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-sama5d2-isc.c
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static void isc_sama5d2_config_rlp(struct isc_device *isc)
* Thus, if the YCYC mode is selected, replace it with the
* sama5d2-compliant mode which is YYCC .
*/
- if ((rlp_mode & ISC_RLP_CFG_MODE_YCYC) == ISC_RLP_CFG_MODE_YCYC) {
+ if ((rlp_mode & ISC_RLP_CFG_MODE_MASK) == ISC_RLP_CFG_MODE_YCYC) {
rlp_mode &= ~ISC_RLP_CFG_MODE_MASK;
rlp_mode |= ISC_RLP_CFG_MODE_YYCC;
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists