lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:31:30 -0500
From:   Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Removing unsupported branches into stable-historic.git

Hi, all:

What do you think about deleting unsupported linux-x.x.y branches from the
stable/linux.git repository (perhaps by moving them into stable-historic.git).
These branches hold a lot of git objects that are now largely dead weight but
are still shipped around every time stable/linux.git is cloned.

According to my cursory tests, dropping unsupported branches would remove
1.1GB of obsolete objects, dropping the repository size from 3.5GB to 2.4GB
(sizes may vary in your tests due to compression, window size, etc). That's
1.1GB less traffic for each stable/linux.git clone.

Thoughts?

-Konstantin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ