[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jwpMbz0woftSfm3EO05pr3ZG9rVMJCkYVsapKYSOn3xw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 10:06:36 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Santosh Sivaraj <santosh@...six.org>, maddy@...ux.ibm.com,
rnsastry@...ux.ibm.com,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Add perf interface to expose nvdimm
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 8:34 AM Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Patchset adds performance stats reporting support for nvdimm.
> Added interface includes support for pmu register/unregister
> functions. A structure is added called nvdimm_pmu to be used for
> adding arch/platform specific data such as cpumask, nvdimm device
> pointer and pmu event functions like event_init/add/read/del.
> User could use the standard perf tool to access perf events
> exposed via pmu.
>
> Interface also defines supported event list, config fields for the
> event attributes and their corresponding bit values which are exported
> via sysfs. Patch 3 exposes IBM pseries platform nmem* device
> performance stats using this interface.
>
> Result from power9 pseries lpar with 2 nvdimm device:
>
> Ex: List all event by perf list
>
> command:# perf list nmem
>
> nmem0/cache_rh_cnt/ [Kernel PMU event]
> nmem0/cache_wh_cnt/ [Kernel PMU event]
> nmem0/cri_res_util/ [Kernel PMU event]
> nmem0/ctl_res_cnt/ [Kernel PMU event]
> nmem0/ctl_res_tm/ [Kernel PMU event]
> nmem0/fast_w_cnt/ [Kernel PMU event]
> nmem0/host_l_cnt/ [Kernel PMU event]
> nmem0/host_l_dur/ [Kernel PMU event]
> nmem0/host_s_cnt/ [Kernel PMU event]
> nmem0/host_s_dur/ [Kernel PMU event]
> nmem0/med_r_cnt/ [Kernel PMU event]
> nmem0/med_r_dur/ [Kernel PMU event]
> nmem0/med_w_cnt/ [Kernel PMU event]
> nmem0/med_w_dur/ [Kernel PMU event]
> nmem0/mem_life/ [Kernel PMU event]
> nmem0/poweron_secs/ [Kernel PMU event]
> ...
> nmem1/mem_life/ [Kernel PMU event]
> nmem1/poweron_secs/ [Kernel PMU event]
>
> Patch1:
> Introduces the nvdimm_pmu structure
> Patch2:
> Adds common interface to add arch/platform specific data
> includes nvdimm device pointer, pmu data along with
> pmu event functions. It also defines supported event list
> and adds attribute groups for format, events and cpumask.
> It also adds code for cpu hotplug support.
> Patch3:
> Add code in arch/powerpc/platform/pseries/papr_scm.c to expose
> nmem* pmu. It fills in the nvdimm_pmu structure with pmu name,
> capabilities, cpumask and event functions and then registers
> the pmu by adding callbacks to register_nvdimm_pmu.
> Patch4:
> Sysfs documentation patch
>
> Changelog
> ---
> Resend v5 -> v6
> - No logic change, just a rebase to latest upstream and
> tested the patchset.
>
> - Link to the patchset Resend v5: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/11/15/3979
>
> v5 -> Resend v5
> - Resend the patchset
>
> - Link to the patchset v5: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/9/28/643
>
> v4 -> v5:
> - Remove multiple variables defined in nvdimm_pmu structure include
> name and pmu functions(event_int/add/del/read) as they are just
> used to copy them again in pmu variable. Now we are directly doing
> this step in arch specific code as suggested by Dan Williams.
>
> - Remove attribute group field from nvdimm pmu structure and
> defined these attribute groups in common interface which
> includes format, event list along with cpumask as suggested by
> Dan Williams.
> Since we added static defination for attrbute groups needed in
> common interface, removes corresponding code from papr.
>
> - Add nvdimm pmu event list with event codes in the common interface.
>
> - Remove Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags as code is refactored
> to handle review comments from Dan.
I don't think review comments should invalidate the Acked-by tags in
this case. Nothing fundamentally changed in the approach, and I would
like to have the perf ack before taking this through the nvdimm tree.
Otherwise this looks good to me.
Peter, might you have a chance to re-Ack this series, or any concerns
about me retrieving those Acks from the previous postings?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists