[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26d74eaa-5c6a-4103-cf77-1356173a3978@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 20:39:24 +0200
From: Ariel Marcovitch <arielmarcovitch@...il.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kconfig: Show menuconfigs as menus in the .config
file
Hello!
On 18/01/2022 20:20, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 7:01 PM Ariel Marcovitch
> <arielmarcovitch@...il.com> wrote:
>> Until now, menuconfigs were considered configs because they had non-zero
>> sym attribute. This meant that instead of having the nice menu comment
>> block in the .config output file, they were merely shown as single
>> configs.
>>
>> For example:
>> ```Kconfig
>> menu "Foo"
>> endmenu
>>
>> menuconfig BAR
>> bool "Bar"
>>
>> config OTHER
>> bool "Other"
>> depends on BAR
>> ```
>>
>> Will be shown as:
>> ```.config
>> #
>> # Foo
>> #
>> # end of Foo
>
> I am OK with this patch.
>
> Just a nit.
>
> As far as I tested your sample code (without applying this patch),
> I did not see the line "# end of Foo".
>
> The line "# end of ..." is printed when the last child gets back to
> its parent, but the "Foo" menu has no child menu here.
>
> This is out of scope of this patch, but can you update the
> commit log so it matches the current behavior?
I saw you added a patch to change that, so now the code sample here is
less of a lie :)
I learned my message of never adding code samples to commit messages
without testing these as well :)
So is it ready now to be applied on top of your change?
> (or add one config into the "Foo" menu)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> CONFIG_BAR=y
>> CONFIG_OTHER=y
>> ```
>>
>> Instead of using the sym attribute to decide whether or not to print the
>> menu block comment, check menu->prompt->type explicitly (after checking
>> that menu_is_visible(menu) which means menu->prompt is not none). The
>> only prompt types we actually show as menus are P_MENU and P_COMMENT. At
>> the end of the menu we need to show the end of block only for P_MENU
>> (although P_COMMENT prompts will not get to this flow because they don't
>> have children).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ariel Marcovitch <arielmarcovitch@...il.com>
>> ---
>> scripts/kconfig/confdata.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/confdata.c b/scripts/kconfig/confdata.c
>> index 42bc56ee238c..9f2c22f46ee0 100644
>> --- a/scripts/kconfig/confdata.c
>> +++ b/scripts/kconfig/confdata.c
>> @@ -874,16 +874,21 @@ int conf_write(const char *name)
>> menu = rootmenu.list;
>> while (menu) {
>> sym = menu->sym;
>> - if (!sym) {
>> - if (!menu_is_visible(menu))
>> - goto next;
>> - str = menu_get_prompt(menu);
>> - fprintf(out, "\n"
>> - "#\n"
>> - "# %s\n"
>> - "#\n", str);
>> - need_newline = false;
>> - } else if (!(sym->flags & SYMBOL_CHOICE) &&
>> +
>> + if (menu_is_visible(menu)) {
>> + enum prop_type type = menu->prompt->type;
>> +
>> + if (type == P_MENU || type == P_COMMENT) {
>> + str = menu_get_prompt(menu);
>> + fprintf(out, "\n"
>> + "#\n"
>> + "# %s\n"
>> + "#\n", str);
>> + need_newline = false;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (sym && !(sym->flags & SYMBOL_CHOICE) &&
>> !(sym->flags & SYMBOL_WRITTEN)) {
>> sym_calc_value(sym);
>> if (!(sym->flags & SYMBOL_WRITE))
>> @@ -904,7 +909,8 @@ int conf_write(const char *name)
>> if (menu->next)
>> menu = menu->next;
>> else while ((menu = menu->parent)) {
>> - if (!menu->sym && menu_is_visible(menu) &&
>> + if (menu_is_visible(menu) &&
>> + menu->prompt->type == P_MENU &&
>> menu != &rootmenu) {
>> str = menu_get_prompt(menu);
>> fprintf(out, "# end of %s\n", str);
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists