[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <875ypcneqo.fsf@jljusten-skl>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 11:42:23 -0800
From: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@...el.com>
To: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@...el.com>,
Robert Beckett <bob.beckett@...labora.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>,
Thomas Hellström
<thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>,
Simon Ser <contact@...rsion.fr>,
Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@...il.com>,
Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@...tecape.org>,
mesa-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org, Tony Ye <tony.ye@...el.com>,
Slawomir Milczarek <slawomir.milczarek@...el.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/5] drm/i915/uapi: document behaviour for DG2 64K
support
Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@...el.com> writes:
> On 2022-02-18 at 18:06:00 +0000, Robert Beckett wrote:
>>
>> If desired, we can make the wording clearer, maybe something like:
>>
>> "To keep things simple for userland, we mandate that any GTT mappings
>> must be aligned to 2MB. The kernel will internally pad them out to the next
>> 2MB boundary"
>
> Added the extra information in next version @
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/475166/?series=100419&rev=1
>
> Jordan, hope this explanation clears your doubt.
Ok. It sounds like what we are doing in Mesa matches what is required by
hardware and the kernel. Thanks.
-Jordan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists