[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <523e473f-3a9f-7d82-1d51-2f5db673c84a@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 11:39:42 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org
Cc: sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, david@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, jgross@...e.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
joro@...tes.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com, knsathya@...nel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, sdeep@...are.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 01/32] x86/mm: Fix warning on build with
X86_MEM_ENCRYPT=y
On 2/18/22 08:16, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> So far, AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT is the only user of X86_MEM_ENCRYPT. TDX will be
> the second. It will make mem_encrypt.c build without AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT,
> which triggers a warning:
>
> arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c:69:13: warning: no previous prototype for
> function 'mem_encrypt_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>
> Fix it by moving mem_encrypt_init() declaration outside of #ifdef
> CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT.
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists