[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bf7f2867a77e4ebe8c44fd0577a3ac55@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 21:11:25 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Andrew Cooper' <Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"joao@...rdrivepizza.com" <joao@...rdrivepizza.com>,
"hjl.tools@...il.com" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
"jpoimboe@...hat.com" <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ndesaulniers@...gle.com" <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"samitolvanen@...gle.com" <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"alyssa.milburn@...el.com" <alyssa.milburn@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 05/29] x86: Base IBT bits
From: Andrew Cooper
> Sent: 18 February 2022 20:50
>
> On 18/02/2022 16:49, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * A bit convoluted, but matches both endbr32 and endbr64 without
> > + * having either as literal in the text.
> > + */
> > +static inline bool is_endbr(const void *addr)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int val = ~*(unsigned int *)addr;
> > + val |= 0x01000000U;
> > + return val == ~0xfa1e0ff3;
> > +}
>
> At this point, I feel I've earned an "I told you so". :)
>
> Clang 13 sees straight through the trickery and generates:
>
> is_endbr: # @is_endbr
> movl $-16777217, %eax # imm = 0xFEFFFFFF
> andl (%rdi), %eax
> cmpl $-98693133, %eax # imm = 0xFA1E0FF3
> sete %al
> retq
I think it is enough to add:
asm("", "=r" (val));
somewhere in the middle.
(I think that is right for asm with input and output in the same
register.)
There might be a HIDE_FOR_OPTIMISER() define that does that.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists