linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/29] x86: Base IBT bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <02a2ff3df3a0093a4f283e09f583d42d@overdrivepizza.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Feb 2022 14:12:40 -0800
From:   Joao Moreira <joao@...rdrivepizza.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, hjl.tools@...il.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
        andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ndesaulniers@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org,
        samitolvanen@...gle.com, mark.rutland@....com,
        alyssa.milburn@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/29] x86: Base IBT bits

> +config CC_HAS_IBT
> +	# GCC >= 9 and binutils >= 2.29
> +	# Retpoline check to work around
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93654
> +	def_bool $(cc-option, -fcf-protection=branch
> -mindirect-branch-register) && $(as-instr,endbr64)
> +
Is -mindirect-branch-register breaks compiling with clang. Maybe we 
should we do instead?

+       def_bool ($(cc-option, -fcf-protection=branch 
-mindirect-branch-register) || $(cc-option, -mretpoline-external-thunk)) 
&& $(as-instr,endbr64)