linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: nixge: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <164516041200.28752.1269210032576115440.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 18 Feb 2022 05:00:12 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: nixge: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC when
 possible

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 21:38:11 +0100 you wrote:
> NIXGE_MAX_JUMBO_FRAME_SIZE is over 9000 bytes and RX_BD_NUM 128.
> 
> So this loop allocates more than 1 Mo of memory.
> 
> Previous memory allocations in this function already use GFP_KERNEL, so
> use __netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align() and an explicit GFP_KERNEL instead of a
> implicit GFP_ATOMIC.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - net: nixge: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC when possible
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/6b48bece871e

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html