linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 16/27] btrfs: tree-checker: check item_size for dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yg92voqmS9jz/rI+@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Feb 2022 11:36:46 +0100
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Su Yue <l@...enly.su>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        clm@...com, josef@...icpanda.com, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 16/27] btrfs: tree-checker: check item_size
 for dev_item

On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 01:40:52PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> From: Su Yue <l@...enly.su>
> 
> [ Upstream commit ea1d1ca4025ac6c075709f549f9aa036b5b6597d ]
> 
> Check item size before accessing the device item to avoid out of bound
> access, similar to inode_item check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Su Yue <l@...enly.su>
> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
> index d4a3a56726aa8..4a5ee516845f7 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
> @@ -947,6 +947,7 @@ static int check_dev_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
>  			  struct btrfs_key *key, int slot)
>  {
>  	struct btrfs_dev_item *ditem;
> +	const u32 item_size = btrfs_item_size(leaf, slot);
>  
>  	if (key->objectid != BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID) {
>  		dev_item_err(leaf, slot,
> @@ -954,6 +955,13 @@ static int check_dev_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
>  			     key->objectid, BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID);
>  		return -EUCLEAN;
>  	}
> +
> +	if (unlikely(item_size != sizeof(*ditem))) {
> +		dev_item_err(leaf, slot, "invalid item size: has %u expect %zu",
> +			     item_size, sizeof(*ditem));
> +		return -EUCLEAN;
> +	}
> +
>  	ditem = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_dev_item);
>  	if (btrfs_device_id(leaf, ditem) != key->offset) {
>  		dev_item_err(leaf, slot,
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

This adds a build warning, showing that the backport is not correct, so
I'll go drop this :(

thanks,

greg k-h