linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] x86/mce: Handle AMD threshold interrupt storms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yg992OrUbfmtRizs@zn.tnic>
Date:   Fri, 18 Feb 2022 12:07:04 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] x86/mce: Handle AMD threshold interrupt storms

On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 09:28:09AM -0800, Luck, Tony wrote:
> I've been sitting on some partially done patches to re-work
> storm handling for Intel ... which rips out all the existing
> storm bits and replaces with something all new. I'll post the
> 2-part series as replies to this.

Which begs the obvious question: how much of that code can be shared
between the two?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette