linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: kexec: Support the case of VA_BITS=39 in trans_pgd_idmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yg+CAXhhkH+HcXXg@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Feb 2022 11:24:49 +0000
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     cgel.zte@...il.com
Cc:     will@...nel.org, pasha.tatashin@...een.com, si.hao@....com.cn,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yang.yang29@....com.cn, zealci@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: kexec: Support the case of VA_BITS=39 in
 trans_pgd_idmap_page()

On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 08:37:34AM +0000, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> From: sihao <si.hao@....com.cn>
> 
> fsl64() may get different values due to different physical addresses. Is
> it possible to confirm the value of max_msb with CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS?
> 
> Reported-by: sihao <si.hao@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: sihao <si.hao@....com.cn>
> Reviewed-by: CatalinMarinas <catalin.marinas@....com>

I have not reviewed this patch yet, so this line shouldn't be here. I'll
have a look next week.

Thanks.

-- 
Catalin