linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2 05/18] x86: remove __range_not

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <905678e9e05d40b9a4e13e7b1a34cb68@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Feb 2022 15:45:56 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@....de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
CC:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        "linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
        "guoren@...nel.org" <guoren@...nel.org>,
        "bcain@...eaurora.org" <bcain@...eaurora.org>,
        "geert@...ux-m68k.org" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        "monstr@...str.eu" <monstr@...str.eu>,
        "tsbogend@...ha.franken.de" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        "nickhu@...estech.com" <nickhu@...estech.com>,
        "green.hu@...il.com" <green.hu@...il.com>,
        "dinguyen@...nel.org" <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
        "shorne@...il.com" <shorne@...il.com>,
        "deller@....de" <deller@....de>,
        "mpe@...erman.id.au" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "hca@...ux.ibm.com" <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "dalias@...c.org" <dalias@...c.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "richard@....at" <richard@....at>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "jcmvbkbc@...il.com" <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
        "ebiederm@...ssion.com" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "ardb@...nel.org" <ardb@...nel.org>,
        "linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org" <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-csky@...r.kernel.org" <linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org" <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
        "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
        "openrisc@...ts.librecores.org" <openrisc@...ts.librecores.org>,
        "linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-sh@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
        "sparclinux@...r.kernel.org" <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-um@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org" <linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 05/18] x86: remove __range_not_ok()

From: Christoph Hellwig
> Sent: 18 February 2022 06:29
...
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
> > index 15b058eefc4e..ee117fcf46ed 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
> > @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ copy_stack_frame(const struct stack_frame_user __user *fp,
> >  {
> >  	int ret;
> >
> > -	if (__range_not_ok(fp, sizeof(*frame), TASK_SIZE))
> > +	if (!__access_ok(fp, sizeof(*frame)))
> >  		return 0;
> 
> Just switch the __get_user calls below to get_user instead.

Is this worth doing at all?
How much userspace code is actually compiled with stack frames?

Won't work well for a 32bit process on a 64bit kernel either.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)