linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: rework criu_restore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ca24c08-9014-3380-b8cc-dc0ed9a01a73@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Feb 2022 18:34:41 -0800
From:   Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To:     Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@....com>, alexander.deucher@....com,
        christian.koenig@....com, Xinhui.Pan@....com, airlied@...ux.ie,
        daniel@...ll.ch, nathan@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
        david.yatsin@....com, rajneesh.bhardwaj@....com
Cc:     amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: rework criu_restore_bos error handling


On 2/18/22 10:35 AM, Felix Kuehling wrote:
> Am 2022-02-18 um 12:39 schrieb trix@...hat.com:
>> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>>
>> Clang static analysis reports this problem
>> kfd_chardev.c:2327:2: warning: 1st function call argument
>>    is an uninitialized value
>>    kvfree(bo_privs);
>>    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> If the copy_from_users(bo_buckets, ...) fails, there is a jump to
>> the generic error handler at exit:.  The freeing of bo_privs and
>> unwinding of the dmabuf_fd loop do not need to be done.
>>
>> Add some specific labels for the early failures.
>> Reorder the frees to be the reverse of their allocs.
>>
>> Move the initialize of 'i' back to the loop.
>> The problem with the early frees predates the loop
>> unwinding problem.
>
> I think the existing error handling strategy in this function is fine. 
> Having only one exit label avoids potential issues when using the 
> wrong label. Freeing NULL pointers is not a problem. The loop becomes 
> a noop if i==0 (this was fixed by you in a previous patch). The only 
> real problem I see is that bo_privs is not initialized. So this should 
> really be a one-line or maybe two-line fix:
>
>     struct kfd_criu_bo_bucket *bo_buckets = NULL;
>     struct kfd_criu_bo_priv_data *bo_privs = NULL;

This is the other way I considered to fix the problem. So it will work.

Tom

>
> Regards,
>   Felix
>
>
>>
>> Fixes: 73fa13b6a511 ("drm/amdkfd: CRIU Implement KFD restore ioctl")
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c | 15 +++++++++------
>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c
>> index 965af2a08bc0..1d5f41ac3832 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c
>> @@ -2102,7 +2102,7 @@ static int criu_restore_bos(struct kfd_process *p,
>>       const bool criu_resume = true;
>>       bool flush_tlbs = false;
>>       int ret = 0, j = 0;
>> -    uint32_t i = 0;
>> +    uint32_t i;
>>         if (*priv_offset + (args->num_bos * sizeof(*bo_privs)) > 
>> max_priv_data_size)
>>           return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -2119,13 +2119,13 @@ static int criu_restore_bos(struct 
>> kfd_process *p,
>>       if (ret) {
>>           pr_err("Failed to copy BOs information from user\n");
>>           ret = -EFAULT;
>> -        goto exit;
>> +        goto free_buckets;
>>       }
>>         bo_privs = kvmalloc_array(args->num_bos, sizeof(*bo_privs), 
>> GFP_KERNEL);
>>       if (!bo_privs) {
>>           ret = -ENOMEM;
>> -        goto exit;
>> +        goto free_buckets;
>>       }
>>         ret = copy_from_user(bo_privs, (void __user *)args->priv_data 
>> + *priv_offset,
>> @@ -2133,12 +2133,12 @@ static int criu_restore_bos(struct 
>> kfd_process *p,
>>       if (ret) {
>>           pr_err("Failed to copy BOs information from user\n");
>>           ret = -EFAULT;
>> -        goto exit;
>> +        goto free_privs;
>>       }
>>       *priv_offset += args->num_bos * sizeof(*bo_privs);
>>         /* Create and map new BOs */
>> -    for (; i < args->num_bos; i++) {
>> +    for (i = 0; i < args->num_bos; i++) {
>>           struct kfd_criu_bo_bucket *bo_bucket;
>>           struct kfd_criu_bo_priv_data *bo_priv;
>>           struct kfd_dev *dev;
>> @@ -2323,8 +2323,11 @@ static int criu_restore_bos(struct kfd_process 
>> *p,
>>           if (bo_buckets[i].alloc_flags & KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_VRAM)
>>               close_fd(bo_buckets[i].dmabuf_fd);
>>       }
>> -    kvfree(bo_buckets);
>> +free_privs:
>>       kvfree(bo_privs);
>> +free_buckets:
>> +    kvfree(bo_buckets);
>> +
>>       return ret;
>>   }
>