lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n51vhcUg5ng7FWzS0-09-zazCk5JKwpvLPfK4w15_r97kw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Feb 2022 18:38:06 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@...cinc.com>,
        agross@...nel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        bgoswami@...eaurora.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        broonie@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        judyhsiao@...omium.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, perex@...ex.cz,
        quic_plai@...cinc.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, rohitkr@...eaurora.org,
        srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, tiwai@...e.com
Cc:     Venkata Prasad Potturu <quic_potturu@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] pinctrl: qcom: Update lpi pin group structure

Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2022-02-14 07:19:51)
> @@ -150,20 +148,20 @@ enum sm8250_lpi_functions {
>         LPI_MUX__,
>  };
>
> -static const unsigned int gpio0_pins[] = { 0 };
> -static const unsigned int gpio1_pins[] = { 1 };
> -static const unsigned int gpio2_pins[] = { 2 };
> -static const unsigned int gpio3_pins[] = { 3 };
> -static const unsigned int gpio4_pins[] = { 4 };
> -static const unsigned int gpio5_pins[] = { 5 };
> -static const unsigned int gpio6_pins[] = { 6 };
> -static const unsigned int gpio7_pins[] = { 7 };
> -static const unsigned int gpio8_pins[] = { 8 };
> -static const unsigned int gpio9_pins[] = { 9 };
> -static const unsigned int gpio10_pins[] = { 10 };
> -static const unsigned int gpio11_pins[] = { 11 };
> -static const unsigned int gpio12_pins[] = { 12 };
> -static const unsigned int gpio13_pins[] = { 13 };
> +static int gpio0_pins[] = { 0 };

Why do we lose const?

> +static int gpio1_pins[] = { 1 };
> +static int gpio2_pins[] = { 2 };
> +static int gpio3_pins[] = { 3 };
> +static int gpio4_pins[] = { 4 };
> +static int gpio5_pins[] = { 5 };
> +static int gpio6_pins[] = { 6 };
> +static int gpio7_pins[] = { 7 };
> +static int gpio8_pins[] = { 8 };
> +static int gpio9_pins[] = { 9 };
> +static int gpio10_pins[] = { 10 };
> +static int gpio11_pins[] = { 11 };
> +static int gpio12_pins[] = { 12 };
> +static int gpio13_pins[] = { 13 };
>  static const char * const swr_tx_clk_groups[] = { "gpio0" };
>  static const char * const swr_tx_data_groups[] = { "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio5" };
>  static const char * const swr_rx_clk_groups[] = { "gpio3" };

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ