[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n529EvPSqGt+XgZipOcSNpyHc6FunuQk_W841hYxWdH2og@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 18:48:05 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
airlied@...ux.ie, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, daniel@...ll.ch,
dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
robdclark@...il.com, sean@...rly.run, vkoul@...nel.org
Cc: quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com, quic_aravindh@...cinc.com,
quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] drm/msm/dpu: adjust display_v_end for eDP and DP
Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2022-02-17 13:36:25)
> The “DP timing” requires the active region to be defined in the
> bottom-right corner of the frame dimensions which is different
> with DSI. Therefore both display_h_end and display_v_end need
> to be adjusted accordingly. However current implementation has
> only display_h_end adjusted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
> ---
Is this not a problem for me because this is set already to something
correct in the hardware?
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists