[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YhDSAJG+LksZSnLP@ip-172-31-19-208.ap-northeast-1.compute.internal>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2022 11:18:24 +0000
From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, cl@...ux.com,
penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
vbabka@...e.cz, David.Laight@...lab.com, david@...hat.com,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, steffen.klassert@...unet.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com,
svens@...ux.ibm.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, michael@...le.cc,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, wsa@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/22] mtd: rawnand: Use dma_alloc_noncoherent() for dma
buffer
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 08:19:00AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 08:52:21AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Use dma_alloc_noncoherent() instead of directly allocating buffer
> > from kmalloc with GFP_DMA. DMA API will try to allocate buffer
> > depending on devices addressing limitation.
>
> I think it would be better to still allocate the buffer at allocation
> time and then just transfer ownership using dma_sync_single* in the I/O
> path to avoid the GFP_ATOMIC allocation.
This driver allocates the buffer at initialization step and maps the buffer
for DMA_TO_DEVICE and DMA_FROM_DEVICE when processing IO.
But after making this driver to use dma_alloc_noncoherent(), remapping
dma_alloc_noncoherent()-ed buffer is strange So I just made it to allocate
the buffer in IO path.
At this point I thought we need an API that allocates based on
address bit mask (like dma_alloc_noncoherent()), which does not maps buffer
into dma address. __get_free_pages/kmalloc(GFP_DMA) has been so confusing..
Hmm.. for this specific case, What about allocating two buffers
for DMA_TO_DEVICE and DMA_FROM_DEVICE at initialization time?
Thanks,
Hyeonggon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists