[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACycT3umMYfwVZRXinEBM=Kh+kQPYH5GBN6eKrt9unZSM8W0qw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2022 21:04:25 +0800
From: Yongji Xie <xieyongji@...edance.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, nbd@...er.debian.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nbd: Don't use workqueue to handle recv work
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 11:21 PM Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 09:17:37PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:
> > Ping again.
> >
> > Hi Josef, could you take a look?
>
> Sorry Yongji this got lost. Again in the reconnect case we're still setting up
> a long running thread, so it's not like it'll happen during a normal reclaim
> path thing, it'll be acted upon by userspace. Thanks,
>
During creating this long running thread, we might trigger memory
reclaim since workqueue will use GFP_KERNEL allocation for it. Then a
deadlock can occur if the memory reclaim happens to hit the page cache
on this reconnecting nbd device.
Thanks,
Yongji
Powered by blists - more mailing lists