| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <27f83612922249a845e9d93134d92e8cb278346c.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2022 11:04:16 -0800
From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jonathan Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...ux.dev>,
nirmal.patel@...ux.intel.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com,
hch@...radead.org, kw@...ux.com, robh@...nel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, michael.a.bottini@...ux.intel.com,
rafael@...nel.org, me@...ityamohan.in
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] PCI: vmd: Add vmd_device_data
On Fri, 2022-02-18 at 14:19 -0700, Jonathan Derrick wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 2/17/2022 9:50 PM, David E. Box wrote:
> > Add vmd_device_data to allow adding additional info for driver
> > data. Also
> > refactor the PCI ID list to use PCI_VDEVICE and simplify
> > assignments for
> > devices that use the same driver_data.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >
> > V5
> > - New patch
> >
> > drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > -----
> > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> > index cc166c683638..a582c351b461 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> > @@ -69,6 +69,10 @@ enum vmd_features {
> > VMD_FEAT_CAN_BYPASS_MSI_REMAP = (1 << 4),
> > };
> >
> > +struct vmd_device_data {
> > + enum vmd_features features;
> > +};
> > +
> > static DEFINE_IDA(vmd_instance_ida);
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -710,11 +714,12 @@ static void vmd_copy_host_bridge_flags(struct
> > pci_host_bridge *root_bridge,
> > vmd_bridge->native_dpc = root_bridge->native_dpc;
> > }
> >
> > -static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd, unsigned long
> > features)
> > +static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd, struct
> > vmd_device_data *info)
> > {
> > struct pci_sysdata *sd = &vmd->sysdata;
> > struct resource *res;
> > u32 upper_bits;
> > + unsigned long features = info->features;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > LIST_HEAD(resources);
> > resource_size_t offset[2] = {0};
> > @@ -881,7 +886,8 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev
> > *vmd, unsigned long features)
> >
> > static int vmd_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct
> > pci_device_id *id)
> > {
> > - unsigned long features = (unsigned long) id->driver_data;
> > + struct vmd_device_data *info = (struct vmd_device_data *)id-
> > >driver_data;
> > + unsigned long features = info->features;
> > struct vmd_dev *vmd;
> > int err;
> >
> > @@ -925,7 +931,7 @@ static int vmd_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const
> > struct pci_device_id *id)
> >
> > spin_lock_init(&vmd->cfg_lock);
> > pci_set_drvdata(dev, vmd);
> > - err = vmd_enable_domain(vmd, features);
> > + err = vmd_enable_domain(vmd, info);
> > if (err)
> > goto out_release_instance;
> >
> > @@ -993,30 +999,30 @@ static int vmd_resume(struct device *dev)
> > #endif
> > static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(vmd_dev_pm_ops, vmd_suspend,
> > vmd_resume);
> >
> > +static const struct vmd_device_data vmd_201d_data = {
> > + .features = VMD_FEAT_HAS_MEMBAR_SHADOW_VSCAP,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct vmd_device_data vmd_28c0_data = {
> > + .features = VMD_FEAT_HAS_MEMBAR_SHADOW |
> > + VMD_FEAT_HAS_BUS_RESTRICTIONS |
> > + VMD_FEAT_CAN_BYPASS_MSI_REMAP,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct vmd_device_data vmd_467f_data = {
> > + .features = VMD_FEAT_HAS_MEMBAR_SHADOW_VSCAP |
> > + VMD_FEAT_HAS_BUS_RESTRICTIONS |
> > + VMD_FEAT_OFFSET_FIRST_VECTOR,
> > +};
> > +
>
> I'm not the biggest fan of this structure
> Can you inline the declarations into the vmd_ids table below?
>
>
>
> > static const struct pci_device_id vmd_ids[] = {
> > - {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VMD_201D),
> > - .driver_data = VMD_FEAT_HAS_MEMBAR_SHADOW_VSCAP,},
> > - {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VMD_28C0),
> > - .driver_data = VMD_FEAT_HAS_MEMBAR_SHADOW |
> > - VMD_FEAT_HAS_BUS_RESTRICTIONS |
> > - VMD_FEAT_CAN_BYPASS_MSI_REMAP,},
> > - {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x467f),
> > - .driver_data = VMD_FEAT_HAS_MEMBAR_SHADOW_VSCAP |
> > - VMD_FEAT_HAS_BUS_RESTRICTIONS |
> > - VMD_FEAT_OFFSET_FIRST_VECTOR,},
> > - {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x4c3d),
> > - .driver_data = VMD_FEAT_HAS_MEMBAR_SHADOW_VSCAP |
> > - VMD_FEAT_HAS_BUS_RESTRICTIONS |
> > - VMD_FEAT_OFFSET_FIRST_VECTOR,},
> > - {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0xa77f),
> > - .driver_data = VMD_FEAT_HAS_MEMBAR_SHADOW_VSCAP |
> > - VMD_FEAT_HAS_BUS_RESTRICTIONS |
> > - VMD_FEAT_OFFSET_FIRST_VECTOR,},
> > - {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VMD_9A0B),
> > - .driver_data = VMD_FEAT_HAS_MEMBAR_SHADOW_VSCAP |
> > - VMD_FEAT_HAS_BUS_RESTRICTIONS |
> > - VMD_FEAT_OFFSET_FIRST_VECTOR,},
> > - {0,}
> > + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VMD_201D),
> > (kernel_ulong_t)&vmd_201d_data },
> > + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VMD_28C0),
> > (kernel_ulong_t)&vmd_28c0_data },
> > + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x467f), (kernel_ulong_t)&vmd_467f_data },
> > + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x4c3d), (kernel_ulong_t)&vmd_467f_data },
> > + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa77f), (kernel_ulong_t)&vmd_467f_data },
> > + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VMD_9A0B),
> > (kernel_ulong_t)&vmd_467f_data },
> > + { }
>
> For instance:
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VMD_201D),
> (kernel_ulong_t)&(struct vmd_device_data) {
> .features =
> VMD_FEAT_HAS_MEMBAR_SHADOW_VSCAP,
Sure.
David
>
>
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, vmd_ids);
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists