[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb7db1ac-8e7e-d549-a5c0-fcd072ae815e@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 19:20:40 +0300
From: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
To: Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: Larry.Finger@...inger.net, phil@...lpotter.co.uk,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] staging: r8188eu: refactor rtw_ch2freq()
Hi Michael,
On 2/20/22 18:48, Michael Straube wrote:
> -static int ch_freq_map_num = ARRAY_SIZE(ch_freq_map);
> -
> u32 rtw_ch2freq(u32 channel)
> {
> - u8 i;
> - u32 freq = 0;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < ch_freq_map_num; i++) {
> - if (channel == ch_freq_map[i].channel) {
> - freq = ch_freq_map[i].frequency;
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> - if (i == ch_freq_map_num)
> - freq = 2412;
> -
> - return freq;
> + return ch_freq_map[channel - 1];
> }
What if channel has wrong value? The old code returned some default
value, but with new one we will hit OOB.
With regards,
Pavel Skripkin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists