lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <fbc744c9-e22f-138c-2da3-f76c3edfcc3d@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:21:12 +0100 From: Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@...il.com> To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> Subject: Re: Is it time to remove reiserfs? On 02/20/2022 01:13 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > Keeping reiserfs in the tree has certain costs. For example, I would > very much like to remove the 'flags' argument to ->write_begin. We have > the infrastructure in place to handle AOP_FLAG_NOFS differently, but > AOP_FLAG_CONT_EXPAND is still around, used only by reiserfs. Please, consider the patch (next email in the thread) which drops that flag from reiserfs. Thanks, Edward.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists