[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220221084940.593128934@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:49:53 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 174/227] ucounts: Handle wrapping in is_ucounts_overlimit
From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
commit 0cbae9e24fa7d6c6e9f828562f084da82217a0c5 upstream.
While examining is_ucounts_overlimit and reading the various messages
I realized that is_ucounts_overlimit fails to deal with counts that
may have wrapped.
Being wrapped should be a transitory state for counts and they should
never be wrapped for long, but it can happen so handle it.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 21d1c5e386bc ("Reimplement RLIMIT_NPROC on top of ucounts")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220216155832.680775-5-ebiederm@xmission.com
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/ucount.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/ucount.c
+++ b/kernel/ucount.c
@@ -350,7 +350,8 @@ bool is_ucounts_overlimit(struct ucounts
if (rlimit > LONG_MAX)
max = LONG_MAX;
for (iter = ucounts; iter; iter = iter->ns->ucounts) {
- if (get_ucounts_value(iter, type) > max)
+ long val = get_ucounts_value(iter, type);
+ if (val < 0 || val > max)
return true;
max = READ_ONCE(iter->ns->ucount_max[type]);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists