linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.15 125/196] tipc: fix wrong notification node addresses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220221084935.121036020@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:49:17 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jon Maloy <jmaloy@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 125/196] tipc: fix wrong notification node addresses

From: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@...hat.com>

commit c08e58438d4a709fb451b6d7d33432cc9907a2a8 upstream.

The previous bug fix had an unfortunate side effect that broke
distribution of binding table entries between nodes. The updated
tipc_sock_addr struct is also used further down in the same
function, and there the old value is still the correct one.

Fixes: 032062f363b4 ("tipc: fix wrong publisher node address in link publications")
Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@...hat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220216020009.3404578-1-jmaloy@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/tipc/node.c |   11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/net/tipc/node.c
+++ b/net/tipc/node.c
@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ static void tipc_node_write_unlock(struc
 	u32 flags = n->action_flags;
 	struct list_head *publ_list;
 	struct tipc_uaddr ua;
-	u32 bearer_id;
+	u32 bearer_id, node;
 
 	if (likely(!flags)) {
 		write_unlock_bh(&n->lock);
@@ -414,6 +414,7 @@ static void tipc_node_write_unlock(struc
 		   TIPC_LINK_STATE, n->addr, n->addr);
 	sk.ref = n->link_id;
 	sk.node = tipc_own_addr(net);
+	node = n->addr;
 	bearer_id = n->link_id & 0xffff;
 	publ_list = &n->publ_list;
 
@@ -423,17 +424,17 @@ static void tipc_node_write_unlock(struc
 	write_unlock_bh(&n->lock);
 
 	if (flags & TIPC_NOTIFY_NODE_DOWN)
-		tipc_publ_notify(net, publ_list, sk.node, n->capabilities);
+		tipc_publ_notify(net, publ_list, node, n->capabilities);
 
 	if (flags & TIPC_NOTIFY_NODE_UP)
-		tipc_named_node_up(net, sk.node, n->capabilities);
+		tipc_named_node_up(net, node, n->capabilities);
 
 	if (flags & TIPC_NOTIFY_LINK_UP) {
-		tipc_mon_peer_up(net, sk.node, bearer_id);
+		tipc_mon_peer_up(net, node, bearer_id);
 		tipc_nametbl_publish(net, &ua, &sk, sk.ref);
 	}
 	if (flags & TIPC_NOTIFY_LINK_DOWN) {
-		tipc_mon_peer_down(net, sk.node, bearer_id);
+		tipc_mon_peer_down(net, node, bearer_id);
 		tipc_nametbl_withdraw(net, &ua, &sk, sk.ref);
 	}
 }