[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220221120809.1531502-32-michael@walle.cc>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 13:08:08 +0100
From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
yaliang.wang@...driver.com, Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Subject: [PATCH v4 31/32] mtd: spi-nor: slightly change code style in spi_nor_sr_ready()
Now that there is almost no special case code left in
spi_nor_sr_ready(), the return check looks odd. Move the function call
closer to the return code checking.
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
---
drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
index f5a2f37d140e..9014008e60b3 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
@@ -563,8 +563,9 @@ int spi_nor_write_ear(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 ear)
*/
int spi_nor_sr_ready(struct spi_nor *nor)
{
- int ret = spi_nor_read_sr(nor, nor->bouncebuf);
+ int ret;
+ ret = spi_nor_read_sr(nor, nor->bouncebuf);
if (ret)
return ret;
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists