[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <feca1bb9-f6d6-e8b3-1688-bf1dcc91125e@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 17:06:15 +0100
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Viktor Mihajlovski <mihajlov@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: Clarify key argument for MEM_OP in api docs
Am 21.02.22 um 15:36 schrieb Janis Schoetterl-Glausch:
> Clarify that the key argument represents the access key, not the whole
> storage key.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> index 48f23bb80d7f..622667cc87ef 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> @@ -3763,7 +3763,7 @@ KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_INJECT_EXCEPTION is set.
>
> If the KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_SKEY_PROTECTION flag is set, storage key
> protection is also in effect and may cause exceptions if accesses are
> -prohibited given the access key passed in "key".
> +prohibited given the access key designated by "key"; the valid range is 0..15.
> KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_SKEY_PROTECTION is available if KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP_EXTENSION
> is > 0.
>
>
> base-commit: af33593d63a403287b8a6edd217e854a3571938b
I have already queued the patches. Will add this on top as a fixup patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists