lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220221085926-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:59:56 -0500
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:     Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc:     Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
        syzbot <syzbot+3140b17cb44a7b174008@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        jasowang@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] kernel BUG in vhost_get_vq_desc

On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 02:45:16PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 09:36:46PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > Hey Stefano,
> > 
> > On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 14:09:26 +0100 Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > > It seems that this patch [1] should fix also this issue. (syzbot seems
> > > happy).
> > 
> > What do you mean by happy?
> > Why not feed it to syzbot if it is a good fix, given a test-by tag can
> > speak for itself?
> 
> Because I sent the patch this morning for another report:
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=1e3ea63db39f2b4440e0
> 
> Then I asked syzbot for this report to test my branch with that patch
> applied and the result is OK.
> 
> Is there any way to ask syzbot to test a patch already posted to the mailing
> list? (instead of sending it back to it again)
> 
> Stefano

I don't know of a way, but hey, sending it back isn't too bad,
just mention this in the mail text.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ