[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YhOcEQEjIKBrbMIZ@Red>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:05:05 +0100
From: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
To: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] crypto: ccree: driver does not handle case where cryptlen
= authsize =0
Le Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 12:08:12PM +0200, Gilad Ben-Yossef a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 9:26 PM Corentin Labbe
> <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> ...
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > While testing your patch for this problem, I saw another warning (unrelated with your patch):
>
> Dear Corentin, you are a treasure trove of bug reports. I love it.
> Thank you! :-)
>
> > [ 34.061953] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [ 34.066656] DMA-API: ccree e6601000.crypto: cacheline tracking EEXIST, overlapping mappings aren't supported
> > [ 34.076555] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 475 at /home/clabbe/linux-next/kernel/dma/debug.c:571 add_dma_entry+0x1d0/0x288
> > [ 34.086748] Modules linked in:
> > [ 34.089809] CPU: 3 PID: 475 Comm: cryptomgr_test Tainted: G W 5.17.0-rc3-next-20220210-00115-g1ca9f29d9780-dirty #25
> > [ 34.101635] Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X board based on r8a77950 (DT)
> > [ 34.108508] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> > [ 34.115471] pc : add_dma_entry+0x1d0/0x288
> > [ 34.119569] lr : add_dma_entry+0x1d0/0x288
> > [ 34.123664] sp : ffff80000e3236f0
> > [ 34.126976] x29: ffff80000e3236f0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000000
> > [ 34.134122] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff80000b3c76c0 x24: ffff80000b3c7000
> > [ 34.141267] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 00000000ffffffef x21: ffff80000a8c1000
> > [ 34.148410] x20: ffff0004c0b93f80 x19: ffff80000b320000 x18: ffffffffffffffff
> > [ 34.155554] x17: 6c7265766f202c54 x16: 534958454520676e x15: 00000000000001fa
> > [ 34.162697] x14: ffff80000e3233f0 x13: 00000000ffffffea x12: ffff80000b3bdda0
> > [ 34.169840] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000001 x9 : ffff80000b3a5db8
> > [ 34.176984] x8 : c0000000ffffefff x7 : 0000000000017fe8 x6 : ffff80000b3a5d60
> > [ 34.184126] x5 : 0000000000057fa8 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 00000000ffffefff
> > [ 34.191269] x2 : ffff80000b34db38 x1 : 371dfc0f85526100 x0 : 0000000000000000
> > [ 34.198411] Call trace:
> > [ 34.200856] add_dma_entry+0x1d0/0x288
> > [ 34.204604] debug_dma_map_sg+0x150/0x398
> > [ 34.208615] __dma_map_sg_attrs+0x9c/0x108
> > [ 34.212717] dma_map_sg_attrs+0x10/0x28
> > [ 34.216554] cc_map_sg+0x80/0x100
> > [ 34.219875] cc_map_cipher_request+0x170/0x3c8
> > [ 34.224319] cc_cipher_process+0x210/0xb58
> > [ 34.228415] cc_cipher_encrypt+0x2c/0x38
> > [ 34.232338] crypto_skcipher_encrypt+0x44/0x78
> > [ 34.236786] drbg_kcapi_sym_ctr+0xdc/0x1f8
> > [ 34.240887] drbg_ctr_generate+0x5c/0x98
> > [ 34.244812] drbg_kcapi_random+0xb4/0x260
> > [ 34.248823] alg_test_stdrng+0xf8/0x2b0
> > [ 34.252661] alg_test.part.29+0xb4/0x398
> > [ 34.256583] alg_test+0x48/0x78
> > [ 34.259724] cryptomgr_test+0x48/0x50
> > [ 34.263386] kthread+0x11c/0x128
> > [ 34.266619] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> > [ 34.270198] irq event stamp: 318
> > [ 34.273424] hardirqs last enabled at (317): [<ffff8000081300e0>] __up_console_sem+0x60/0x98
> > [ 34.281869] hardirqs last disabled at (318): [<ffff800009bfbb18>] el1_dbg+0x28/0x90
> > [ 34.289531] softirqs last enabled at (314): [<ffff800008010550>] __do_softirq+0x4a8/0x5ec
> > [ 34.297796] softirqs last disabled at (305): [<ffff8000080ab644>] irq_exit_rcu+0x18c/0x1b0
> > [ 34.306061] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> >
>
> So, this is an interesting one.
> What I *think* is happening is that the drbg implementation is
> actually doing something naughty: it is passing the same exact memory
> buffer, both as source and destination to an encryption operation to
> the crypto skcipher API, BUT via two different scatter gather lists.
>
> I'm not sure but I believe this is not a legitimate use of the API,
> but before we even go into this, let's see if this little fix helps at
> all and this is indeed the root cause.
>
> Can you test this small change for me, please?
>
> diff --git a/crypto/drbg.c b/crypto/drbg.c
> index 177983b6ae38..13824fd27627 100644
> --- a/crypto/drbg.c
> +++ b/crypto/drbg.c
> @@ -1851,7 +1851,7 @@ static int drbg_kcapi_sym_ctr(struct drbg_state *drbg,
> /* Use scratchpad for in-place operation */
> inlen = scratchpad_use;
> memset(drbg->outscratchpad, 0, scratchpad_use);
> - sg_set_buf(sg_in, drbg->outscratchpad, scratchpad_use);
> + sg_in = sg_out;
> }
>
> while (outlen) {
>
No more stacktrace !
Powered by blists - more mailing lists