[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YhOBDJDdL0Z2tk/j@abelvesa>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 14:09:48 +0200
From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Cc: sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
linux-imx@....com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] clk: imx: add i.MX93 composite clk
On 22-02-15 16:18:33, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>
> i.MX93 CCM ROOT clock has a mux, gate and divider in one register, here
> is to combine all these into one composite clk and simplify clk tree.
> i.MX93 CCM is a new IP compared with i.MX8M, so introduce a new file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/imx/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/clk/imx/clk.h | 9 +++
> 3 files changed, 103 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile b/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
> index b5e040026dfb..15549a1c332f 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ mxc-clk-objs += clk.o
> mxc-clk-objs += clk-busy.o
> mxc-clk-objs += clk-composite-7ulp.o
> mxc-clk-objs += clk-composite-8m.o
> +mxc-clk-objs += clk-composite-93.o
> mxc-clk-objs += clk-cpu.o
> mxc-clk-objs += clk-divider-gate.o
> mxc-clk-objs += clk-fixup-div.o
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b44619aa5ca5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2021 NXP
> + *
> + * Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/export.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#include "clk.h"
> +
> +#define CCM_DIV_SHIFT 0
> +#define CCM_DIV_WIDTH 8
> +#define CCM_MUX_SHIFT 8
> +#define CCM_MUX_MASK 3
> +#define CCM_OFF_SHIFT 24
> +
> +#define AUTHEN_OFFSET 0x30
> +#define TZ_NS_SHIFT 9
> +#define TZ_NS_MASK BIT(9)
> +
> +struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_composite_flags(const char *name, const char * const *parent_names,
> + int num_parents, void __iomem *reg,
> + unsigned long flags)
> +{
> + struct clk_hw *hw = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM), *mux_hw;
> + struct clk_hw *div_hw, *gate_hw;
> + struct clk_divider *div = NULL;
> + struct clk_gate *gate = NULL;
> + struct clk_mux *mux = NULL;
> + bool clk_ro = false;
> +
> + mux = kzalloc(sizeof(*mux), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!mux)
> + goto fail;
> +
> + mux_hw = &mux->hw;
> + mux->reg = reg;
> + mux->shift = CCM_MUX_SHIFT;
> + mux->mask = CCM_MUX_MASK;
> + mux->lock = &imx_ccm_lock;
> +
> + div = kzalloc(sizeof(*div), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!div)
> + goto fail;
> +
> + div_hw = &div->hw;
> + div->reg = reg;
> + div->shift = CCM_DIV_SHIFT;
> + div->width = CCM_DIV_WIDTH;
> + div->lock = &imx_ccm_lock;
> + div->flags = CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST;
> +
> + if (!(readl(reg + AUTHEN_OFFSET) & TZ_NS_MASK))
> + clk_ro = true;
> +
> + if (clk_ro) {
> + hw = clk_hw_register_composite(NULL, name, parent_names, num_parents,
> + mux_hw, &clk_mux_ro_ops, div_hw,
> + &clk_divider_ro_ops, NULL, NULL, flags);
> + } else {
> + gate = kzalloc(sizeof(*gate), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!gate)
> + goto fail;
> +
> + gate_hw = &gate->hw;
> + gate->reg = reg;
> + gate->bit_idx = CCM_OFF_SHIFT;
> + gate->lock = &imx_ccm_lock;
> + gate->flags = CLK_GATE_SET_TO_DISABLE;
> +
> + hw = clk_hw_register_composite(NULL, name, parent_names, num_parents,
> + mux_hw, &clk_mux_ops, div_hw,
> + &clk_divider_ops, gate_hw,
> + &clk_gate_ops, flags | CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT);
Just a thought. Could we just extend the imx8m_composite to do this, instead
of adding this new one? I mean, just because it is a new SoC, doesn't
mean we can't reuse the imx8m composite.
> + }
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(hw))
> + goto fail;
> +
> + return hw;
> +
> +fail:
> + kfree(gate);
> + kfree(div);
> + kfree(mux);
> + return ERR_CAST(hw);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(imx93_clk_composite_flags);
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
> index 7d220a01de1f..63eb7c53b123 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
> @@ -419,6 +419,15 @@ struct clk_hw *__imx8m_clk_hw_composite(const char *name,
> IMX_COMPOSITE_FW_MANAGED, \
> IMX_COMPOSITE_CLK_FLAGS_CRITICAL_GET_RATE_NO_CACHE)
>
> +struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_composite_flags(const char *name,
> + const char * const *parent_names,
> + int num_parents,
> + void __iomem *reg,
> + unsigned long flags);
> +#define imx93_clk_composite(name, parent_names, num_parents, reg) \
> + imx93_clk_composite_flags(name, parent_names, num_parents, reg, \
> + CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT | CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE)
> +
> struct clk_hw *imx_clk_hw_divider_gate(const char *name, const char *parent_name,
> unsigned long flags, void __iomem *reg, u8 shift, u8 width,
> u8 clk_divider_flags, const struct clk_div_table *table,
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists