linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: enable apll tuner

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <164545706169.730905.15839904852131851975.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:24:21 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     tiwai@...e.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        Trevor Wu <trevor.wu@...iatek.com>
Cc:     yc.hung@...iatek.com, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        bicycle.tsai@...iatek.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: enable apll tuner

On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 13:57:16 +0800, Trevor Wu wrote:
> Normally, the clock source of audio module is either 26M or APLL1/APLL2,
> but APLL1/APLL2 are not the multiple of 26M.
> 
> In the patch, APLL1 and APLL2 tuners are enabled to handle sample rate
> mismatch when the data path crosses two different clock domains.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: enable apll tuner
      commit: ff5a90173d981934e1134d28af3625acaab01d80

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark