linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/227] 5.16.11-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6c099f84-ed6c-8608-df8f-74fbf2de7151@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Mon, 21 Feb 2022 10:17:06 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/227] 5.16.11-rc1 review

On 2/21/22 09:56, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 09:17:51AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 2/21/22 00:46, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.11 release.
>>> There are 227 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:48:58 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>
>> Building mips:malta_defconfig ... failed
>> --------------
>> Error log:
>> net/netfilter/xt_socket.c: In function 'socket_mt_destroy':
>> net/netfilter/xt_socket.c:224:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'nf_defrag_ipv6_disable'; did you mean 'nf_defrag_ipv4_disable'? [
>>
>> Inherited from upstream.
> 
> Ah, fun :(
> 
> I'll leave this for now, it's "just" a Kconfig dependancy issue.  Does
> upstream know about it?
> 

Yes. And, no, it is not just a Kconfig dependency issue.
NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_SOCKET does not historically and should
not depend on IPV6. There is a missing #ifdef in
net/netfilter/xt_socket.c.

Guenter