[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220221084939.755611375@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:49:27 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Kim Scarborough <kim@...rborough.kim>,
"Paulo Alcantara (SUSE)" <pc@....nz>,
Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 148/227] cifs: fix confusing unneeded warning message on smb2.1 and earlier
From: Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>
commit 53923e0fe2098f90f339510aeaa0e1413ae99a16 upstream.
When mounting with SMB2.1 or earlier, even with nomultichannel, we
log the confusing warning message:
"CIFS: VFS: multichannel is not supported on this protocol version, use 3.0 or above"
Fix this so that we don't log this unless they really are trying
to mount with multichannel.
BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215608
Reported-by: Kim Scarborough <kim@...rborough.kim>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.11+
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) <pc@....nz>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/cifs/sess.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/cifs/sess.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/sess.c
@@ -76,11 +76,6 @@ int cifs_try_adding_channels(struct cifs
struct cifs_server_iface *ifaces = NULL;
size_t iface_count;
- if (ses->server->dialect < SMB30_PROT_ID) {
- cifs_dbg(VFS, "multichannel is not supported on this protocol version, use 3.0 or above\n");
- return 0;
- }
-
spin_lock(&ses->chan_lock);
new_chan_count = old_chan_count = ses->chan_count;
@@ -94,6 +89,12 @@ int cifs_try_adding_channels(struct cifs
return 0;
}
+ if (ses->server->dialect < SMB30_PROT_ID) {
+ spin_unlock(&ses->chan_lock);
+ cifs_dbg(VFS, "multichannel is not supported on this protocol version, use 3.0 or above\n");
+ return 0;
+ }
+
if (!(ses->server->capabilities & SMB2_GLOBAL_CAP_MULTI_CHANNEL)) {
ses->chan_max = 1;
spin_unlock(&ses->chan_lock);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists