[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB54833D7636348D62F931526CE33A9@BN9PR11MB5483.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 07:41:14 +0000
From: "Zhang, Tianfei" <tianfei.zhang@...el.com>
To: "Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@...el.com>, "trix@...hat.com" <trix@...hat.com>,
"mdf@...nel.org" <mdf@...nel.org>,
"Xu, Yilun" <yilun.xu@...el.com>,
"linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 2/7] fpga: dfl: check feature type before parse irq
info
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wu, Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 11:35 AM
> To: Zhang, Tianfei <tianfei.zhang@...el.com>; trix@...hat.com;
> mdf@...nel.org; Xu, Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>; linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-doc@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: corbet@....net
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/7] fpga: dfl: check feature type before parse irq info
>
> > Subject: [PATCH v1 2/7] fpga: dfl: check feature type before parse irq
> > info
> >
> > From: Tianfei Zhang <tianfei.zhang@...el.com>
> >
> > The feature ID of "Port User Interrupt" and the "PMCI Subsystem" are
> > identical, 0x12, but one is for FME, other is for Port. It should
> > check the feature type While parsing the irq info in
> > parse_feature_irqs().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tianfei Zhang <tianfei.zhang@...el.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/fpga/dfl.c | 11 +++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl.c index
> > 599bb21d86af..26f8cf890700 100644
> > --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
> > @@ -940,9 +940,14 @@ static int parse_feature_irqs(struct
> > build_feature_devs_info *binfo, {
> > void __iomem *base = binfo->ioaddr + ofst;
> > unsigned int i, ibase, inr = 0;
> > + enum dfl_id_type type;
> > int virq;
> > u64 v;
> >
> > + type = feature_dev_id_type(binfo->feature_dev);
> > + if (type >= DFL_ID_MAX)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
>
> You don't have to check this, it doesn't allow creating feature dev with type >=
> DFL_ID_MAX.
I agree, I will fix on next version.
>
> > /*
> > * Ideally DFL framework should only read info from DFL header, but
> > * current version DFL only provides mmio resources information for
> > @@ -959,16 +964,22 @@ static int parse_feature_irqs(struct
> > build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> > */
> > switch (fid) {
> > case PORT_FEATURE_ID_UINT:
> > + if (type != PORT_ID)
> > + break;
> > v = readq(base + PORT_UINT_CAP);
> > ibase = FIELD_GET(PORT_UINT_CAP_FST_VECT, v);
> > inr = FIELD_GET(PORT_UINT_CAP_INT_NUM, v);
> > break;
> > case PORT_FEATURE_ID_ERROR:
> > + if (type != PORT_ID)
> > + break;
> > v = readq(base + PORT_ERROR_CAP);
> > ibase = FIELD_GET(PORT_ERROR_CAP_INT_VECT, v);
> > inr = FIELD_GET(PORT_ERROR_CAP_SUPP_INT, v);
> > break;
> > case FME_FEATURE_ID_GLOBAL_ERR:
> > + if (type != FME_ID)
> > + break;
> > v = readq(base + FME_ERROR_CAP);
> > ibase = FIELD_GET(FME_ERROR_CAP_INT_VECT, v);
> > inr = FIELD_GET(FME_ERROR_CAP_SUPP_INT, v);
> > --
> > 2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists