[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220221084941.900619489@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:50:32 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 213/227] mm: io_uring: allow oom-killer from io_uring_setup
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
[ Upstream commit 0a3f1e0beacf6cc8ae5f846b0641c1df476e83d6 ]
On an overcommitted system which is running multiple workloads of
varying priorities, it is preferred to trigger an oom-killer to kill a
low priority workload than to let the high priority workload receiving
ENOMEMs. On our memory overcommitted systems, we are seeing a lot of
ENOMEMs instead of oom-kills because io_uring_setup callchain is using
__GFP_NORETRY gfp flag which avoids the oom-killer. Let's remove it and
allow the oom-killer to kill a lower priority job.
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220125051736.2981459-1-shakeelb@google.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 698db7fb62e06..a92f276f21d9c 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -8872,10 +8872,9 @@ static void io_mem_free(void *ptr)
static void *io_mem_alloc(size_t size)
{
- gfp_t gfp_flags = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_COMP |
- __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_ACCOUNT;
+ gfp_t gfp = GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_COMP;
- return (void *) __get_free_pages(gfp_flags, get_order(size));
+ return (void *) __get_free_pages(gfp, get_order(size));
}
static unsigned long rings_size(unsigned sq_entries, unsigned cq_entries,
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists